Pages

Showing posts with label L3-Biology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label L3-Biology. Show all posts

Monday, 4 April 2022

The cultural evolution of death and spirituality

It was in the time period where neanderthals and homo sapiens began to roam the Earth that evidence of art and spirituality began to appear, suggesting that hominids had shifted from trying to stay alive through finding food and shelter, to now having the time and brain complexity to be thinking more abstract thought and performing spiritual and symbolic rituals, such as burials. There is evidence of these mass burial sites spanning back to the Palaeolithic period, when the neanderthals lived. However, it is difficult for archeologists to determine whether these burials were intentionally made, whether there was abstract or 'higher' thinking surrounding them, etc. 

For example, in the Shanidar Cave in Iraq, the fossils of at least 10 neanderthals were discovered and are believed to date back 60,000-90,000 years. What made this discovery initially groundbreaking was the appearance of pollen alongside the fossilised skeletons, which made archeologists suggest flowers were placed beside them during burial. If true, this meant neanderthals were possibly capable of abstract and symbolic thinking, up to 90,000 years ago. Some scientists suggest that later hominids may have returned to the burial site to place the flowers later, or that it was actually mice who carried in traces of pollen from the outside environment into the burial site. So, scientists are still unsure whether these skeletons were buried intentionally with ritual or not. 

In a cave in Atapuerca, Spain, nicknamed "the pit of bones", 600,500 bone fragments were discovered, of both animals and 28 hominins, believed to be of the Denisovan species. These fossils are believed to be at least 300,000 years old and may be as old as 600,000 years. Lack of evidence suggesting a flood or ground collapse that would have trapped the individuals in the cave have lead scientists to believe that these denisovan individuals were intentionally placed in the cave after their death. However, we don't know the reason why. The individuals may have been put in the cave after they died to remove the smell of rotting flesh, or to stop the corpses from being eaten by predators. Or, the individuals may have been diseased, and put in the cave to avoid transmission, but this would suggest these hominins had knowledge of disease transmission in the first place: due to the brain size of the denisovans, this is unlikely. But while they may have been placed there intentionally, the skeletons of these individuals were not arranged in the cave, which doesn't suggest a burial ritual happened. 

However, in 2013, The Rising Star Cave in South Africa, the remains of fifteen Homo Naledis, dating to around 250,000 B.C were discovered. The remains were located in the 'Dinaledi Chamber', which could only be accessed through the 'Superman's crawl' and 'The Dragon's Back', stretches of cave which were only around 1ft tall. What is interesting about this site is that each of the remains were placed there gradually, over time. Scientists agree that while the Dinaledi chamber was used to dispose of the dead, they do not all agree that the cave is a definite burial site, where the skeletons were buried intentionally and with ritual. There is no evidence of symbolism that suggested higher thinking in these hominins, and the individuals could have again been placed there to remove the smell of rotting flesh, or to stop the corpses from being eaten by animals. 

It was in the Qafzeh Cave in Mt. Precipice, Israel, that 15 skeletal remains dating back to 92,000 B.C were discovered. These fossils were of very early homo sapiens, buried alongside flint tools, seashells, and red ochre clay. What's interesting about the burial of these remains is that some of them were buried in an orderly fashion within the floor of the cave, rather than, for example, the "pit of bones" where remains seemed to be just dumped there in no particular arrangement. Two of the skeletons had deer antlers in their hands and some bones of the remains were coated in this red ochre clay: this is important because it suggests some aspect of symbolism, some higher thinking in the homo sapiens who buried them, as well as ritual and burial preparation. Since it was the bones coated in red ochre, and not flesh (which would not have been discovered in the fossil record), this indicates people went back to the burial site, perhaps to grieve these individuals. The tools they were buried with suggest homo sapiens could have had some form of belief in an afterlife, that these individuals would need the tools later. These discoveries at Qazef cave were really significant because it shows evidence of such profound cultural and spiritual evolution in homo sapiens by 92, 000 B.C. It indicates hominins were beginning to instead devote their time to more abstract and 'higher-up' thinking, signalling a shift from living to purely survive, to living for more abstract, perhaps religious, and more 'recreational' purposes. From there, homo sapiens continued to evolve culturally, moving onto cave paintings, the development of agriculture, permanent settlements, and eventually, more complex burial rituals, like those of Ancient Egyptian mummies. Today, every single culture on Earth have their own special burial rituals. I find it so interesting for us to be able to look back and see when and how our own archaic ancestors started it all. 

Tuesday, 29 March 2022

Hunting/gathering lifestyle vs. an agricultural lifestyle

Before the last glacial maximum of Earth around 20 000 years ago, humans were living a hunting-gathering lifestyle. Using advanced projectile weapons such as bows, arrows, and spears, coinciding with advanced intelligence and good communication skills, humans became excellent hunters. However, this lead to many of the Earth's large animals being killed off. 

This was not the only disadvantage to the hunter-gatherer lifestyle that humans used for many years.
  • Finding animals to hunt and then actually killing them took lots of time and energy for humans. This meant they couldn't focus on other things that would've helped them develop eg. cultural development. 

  • Humans couldn't carry many belongings on them because they were always on the move: everything they owned, they had to carry.

There were some advantages to this hunter-gatherer lifestyle.
  • Less resources and land were required to gather food. 

  • There was reduced transmission of diseases, as livestock weren't held in captivity/in close range to each other to allow for disease to spread far. 

  • Since humans had to always be on the move to find animals to hunt, there was less exploitation of the resources of just one certain area, meaning there was less pressure on the species inhabiting that area.
     
  • There was less reliance on just 1-2 limited food sources, they could hunt a variety of lean and fatty meats from different animals which did provide good nutrients. 

However, around that 20,000 k.y.a mark, Earth went through a significant climate change where it became warmer, forested areas and grasslands become more prominent: the region became more favourable for human living. As a result of this, they could live in one place at a time and form simple settlements. With the killing off of many large animals happening at the same time, the first evidence of agriculture appeared in this time period.

A settled, agricultural-rich lifestyle provided many advantages to humans.

  • For one, less energy was required, since humans didn't have to go travelling for miles finding their prey to kill. Instead they could stay in one spot, their simple settlement, and use that energy towards other useful activities. Farming gave humans the time for reproduction, increasing populations and therefore protection from predators, and cultural development: i.e learning about farming, developing new and better techniques and technology, and sharing that knowledges with others in their settlement: role specialisation and division of labour would've started to be used for more productive farming as agriculture become more prominent. 

  • Farming provided humans with a steady and high quality food supply.

  • Humans no longer had to rely on 'mass kill sites' for meat, which would have often went to waste if it wasn't eaten quickly enough due to rot. They could kill exactly however many animals they needed to feed settlements at a time and not waste food.

However, changing to settled and agricultural rich lifestyles also had it's disadvantages:
  • Natural disasters could wipe out entire crops at a time, meaning entire settlements could lose most or even all of their food supply. 

  • Nearby settlements or other humans could easily come and steal crops and harvests.

  • Lots of animals living in very close proximity to each other increased the risk of disease transmission spreading quickly through livestock.

Despite these disadvantages, agriculture was one of the greatest developments in human history because it supported large populations of people living in settlements and eventually villages and cities, lead to the technological innovation such as the invention of the wheel, plough, hoe etc, helped introduced trade, and the domestication of animals, helping humans move up and eventually dominate the food chain, and Earth itself. To this day, we rely so heavily on agriculture without even necessarily realising the full extent to which we do. 

Tuesday, 22 March 2022

Potatools

 


In Biology we have been learning about hominid development as part of the human evolution topic. One topic we have been focusing on recently is stone tools, which are obviously a key part of hominid adaptation and development. 

There are four main types of stone tools, increasing in complexity as time progressed:

-Oldowan tools were associated with H. Habillis around 2.7-1.7 million years ago. They were fashioned by striking two stones together 5-6 times to produce a sharp(ish) edge.

-Acheulian tools were associated with H. Erectus and H. Ergaster. These tools were more complex, fully shaped, required more planning and were often teardrop shaped. They took around 50 blows to make.

-Mousterian tools are associated with Neanderthals, produced across much of Europe, Asia and Africa around 600 000- 400 000 years ago. They were much more complex compared to oldowan tools as they required more than 150 blows. Flint was often used because it flakes in a predictable manner, making the tools easier to make and craft. It reflects on the hominid brain quickly developing and becoming more intelligent.

-Finally, upper paleolithic tools are associated with H. sapiens beginnign around 50 000 years ago. They required more than 250+ blows and are very complex, use a variety of material, and reflect on the very intelligent human brain. 

Monday, 14 March 2022

Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution

In 1987, geneticists Allan Wilson, Rebecca Louise Cann, and Mark Stoneking published the article "Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution", in which they showed that all modern, living humans can be traced back to a single woman living in Africa, approximately 100-200 000 years ago, later coined 'Mitochondrial Eve'. They found this evidence by sourcing mitochondrial DNA from 147 humans, living in vastly different areas of the world- Asia, Europe, New Guinea, Australia, Africa, from placentas. Mitochondrial DNA differs from 'regular' DNA in that it is only passed down maternally, from mother to daughter, and does not recombine during meiosis. This means it doesn't change between offspring aside from mutations- however, the geneticists found that the mutations occurred fairly consistently and were able to actually use them to their advantage, like a 'biological clock' where they could get an accurate idea of the timeline and trace the lineage of the shared mtDNA way back until they found this last common ancestor, the "Mitochondrial Eve". The "Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution" article suggests this single woman's bloodline or 'lineage' by chance, survived over all other lineages, was continually passed down from mother to offspring, not changing aside from mutations, and expanded all over the world to eventually be present in every single currently living human's mtDNA. 

Source:

Haskett, D. (October 10 2014). "Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution" (1987), by Rebecca Louise Cann, Mark Stoneking, and Allan Charles Wilson.