Pages

Friday 29 March 2019

UNWIND NOVEL STUDY 🌠 (updated weekly)

Unwind Novel Study 
Started 21.02.19

DYSTOPIAN LITERATURE

According to the Science-Fiction dictionary Brave New Worlds, dystopian literature is "an imagined society or state of affairs in which conditions are extremely bad, especially in which these conditions result from the continuation of some current trend to an extreme."

Name three synonyms for dystopia.
  1. Post-apocalyptic universe
  2. Apocalypse
  3. Anti-utopia
What is the antonym for dystopia?
Utopia: A community or world which is seen as the 'perfect' place by its citizens: unproblematic, peaceful, etc. 

Which dystopian novels have you read?
I've read a ton of Stephen King books, an author who is well known for his post-apocalyptic and horror books. 'The Stand' by Stephen King is probably my favourite post-apocalyptic book, after that it is A Clockwork Orange (which is also my favourite movie of all time) The Hunger Games, the entire Maze Runner series, and Animal Farm by George Orwell, to name a few. 

How many others can you name?
1984 by George Orwell may be the first book that comes to mind when I think of dystopian novels. Though I haven't read it yet, maybe I'll have a good look for it. Well... that is, after I read Unwind. 

______________________________________________


Looking at the original cover of Unwind, answer the following questions, remember to explain why you think that for each answer.

How do you think the story will be written?
Judging by the text on the cover that says "Before the Hunger Games there was...", I think this implies that the story is set in the Hunger Games universe, or at least mentions the Hunger Games or its characters.

Why do you think the book is entitled as it is?
Reading the back of the book, it mentions that the harvesting of teenagers' body parts is a common practice in society. 'Unwind' may be a word to describe how they harvest these parts. Another interpretation I had was that 'Unwind' means to unwind memories of that teenager, but I could be wrong. 




Where and when do you think the story will take place? The Hunger Games universe, or a dystopian, post-apocalyptic universe sometime in the future. I believe this because of the text on the front cover.

__________________________________________________



EXPLORING THE BLURB


1. What do you already know about pro-life and pro-choice groups? What do these terms mean? Is it an issue you have really thought about?
Pro-life groups are biased to the opinion that abortion is murder. Pro-choice groups believe that because the fetus isn't alive and born yet, it means it isn't murder, and that, yes, abortions should be legal. Personally I think that there are more reasons why abortions should be legal which outweigh reasons why it shouldn't, but that's my opinion. Other than that I haven't really thought about it.

2. What do you know about organ donation? Organ donation is the act of donating your organs to someone who needs them. The most common form of organ donation are donating a kidney or giving blood, but there are more organs that can be donated, typically when a person is deceased. Some famous scientists have donated their brains, hearts, etc. to science to help with research, which I think is a very good idea, and more people should be doing it.

3. Teenagers to be unwound are sent to Harvest Camps. Can you make a connection between these camps and other places where people have been sent historically? I made a connection between the Harvest camps and the horrific concentration camps that Jews were sent to in Nazi Germany.

4. What religious connotation does the word 'harvest' evoke?
Personally this was difficult to answer as I'm not religious but it turns out harvest is a word used in the Christian religion to describe God's 'provision for us, and blessings for others'.
5. The term 'living in a divided state' here is really a euphemism for what? Can you think of other, common euphemisms? Why do people use euphemisms? *
'Living in a divided state' could possibly be a euphemism for literally having your body parts unattached and divided.

6. What is the definition of legal?













The definition of legal is the act of doing something permitted or allowed by law. Something set in place by the government. The opposite of legal is illegal.

7. What about ethical?











Something that is morally correct; a way of behaviour that is considered good. 


8. Do you believe that because something is legal, it means it is ethical, or morally right?
No, just because it's a law doesn't mean everyone agrees with it. There are so many diverse cultures and nations of the world, and we don't believe every law there is. An example of this is martial law; it may be legal to put into place, but it is still not ethical, in my opinion. Another example is the destruction of palm oil plantations particularly in Asia and Indonesia; it's allowed by law, but it's definitely not ethical, in my opinion.

9&10. Can things that are ethically sound ever be illegal? Can you provide examples in history to support your ideas?
Take marijuana for example. It is currently illegal for predominantly everyone in New Zealand despite it having enormous health benefits for cancer patients etc. In my opinion marijuana is definitely ethical, but it's currently illegal. So, yeah, things that are ethical can totally be illegal, at least in my eyes. For some people, another example is abortion. Particularly in the U.S, some states have completely banned abortions despite some people believing it is an ethical option that woman should have the right to have. In fact, 25% of the world's countries have banned abortion all together. 

Part One: Triplicate

1. How much brainwashing do you think has happened for teenagers to make this sort of claim as they're being lead to their "death"?
There must have been a large amount of brainwashing for this to happen because people don't just have these incorrect assumptions for nothing. How this brainwashing took place, however, I don't know just yet. Perhaps there's something in the water? 

2. Why, do you think, that Shusterman chosen to have three characters tell the story?
The author possibly did this to provide unique perspectives and back-stories from different people, rather than just having the same 'boring' stuff throughout the text.

3. Lev is a tithe. This means he is the 10% that his family will give back to the church as an offering. What are your thoughts on this?
This is like asking me if I believe separating body parts among humans is ethical (which it's not, in most circumstances). From a religious stance I see why this would be deemed ethical, though, since some religions today have rather strange sacrifices too, at least in my eyes. People will always have beliefs, personally I don't believe that just because it is allowed by religion, dividing and harvesting body parts between humans becomes ethical, but that's just my opinion. 

4. Rita is a state-home kid - she was unwanted at birth, and now the state have decided she is no longer useful. Do you think that the state should ever be able to determine if one life is more useful than another?
I don't think this is even a question. We're all good for something even if we don't know it, but for someone to determine who is better than who is completely unethical in my opinion. The state definitely shouldn't be allowed to decide who, let alone punish those who are not useful anymore. 


5. Connors parents have chosen to unwind him due to his disruptive behaviour. Then they have booked a ticket to the Bahamas. In your opinion, how do parents view their children? Why do you think this? 
I think most parents would not send their son/daughter to have their body harvested - but it seems like this family in particular thinks of their son as a sort of 'brick' that's slowing them down from achieving their goals, and that 'unwinding' him is the only solution to this. I think this because they seemingly haven't tried anything else to get Connor help, instead going straight to unwinding him. Although it can't relate to everyone, I feel like some parents can relate to this: that they think of their children as something slowing them down from achieving their goals.

6. Pastor Dan presents as being conflicted. What reasons might he have to encourage Lev in his journey as a tithe? Why does he encourage him to run?
Pastor Dan certainly comes off as a conflicted character, and not my favourite character, personally, because of it. He has reasons to encourage Lev, though; they are pretty close and might think of Lev as a friend. But, this could also be a reason for why he encouraged Lev to run. If Lev and Pastor Dan are friends, Pastor Dan having much more knowledge on the harvesting process than Lev, why would he lead his friend to death? The only question remaining is, why didn't Pastor Dan try to get Lev out of the situation before he was on the way there?

7. What is the story based on the nursery rhyme that circulates among the youth?



WORKSHOP DISCUSSION

Conscience corridor: Based on what we have learnt about the characters so far, should they be unwound?


Have the rules of unwinding fairly been applied to all characters? Have you found quotes in the text to support your thinking? 
In my opinion, no.

if you were to unwind one character at this point, who would it be? 
Personally I would unwind Lev, he seems to be the most consenting and he is happy to give his 10% to the church like his family instructed him to. 

if you were to save one character at this point, who would it be?
I personally would save Connor because I feel like his anger and frustration has a lot of potential. But I still love Risa too. Maybe I would save both of them. Or all three of them. Yes, all three of them. 



PART II: STORKED

1. Risa overhears two nurses talking about the law and human nature. Which argument do you think is stronger? I agree with Nurse Greta's statement (you cannot change law without first changing human nature). This is because I related it to real-life events outside of the book; for example, slavery. Just because a law abolishing slavery came into place didn't mean that people changed their ways. Humans won't necessarily change their human nature just because a law has changed.

2. This section opens with a mother abandoning her newborn infant on the doorstep of a house in a good neighbourhood. As she leaves, she thinks, "How wonderful it is that she can get a second chance. How wonderful it is that she can dismiss her responsibility so easily." In your opinion, does it take away from the value of a child?
I do believe that the ability to pass your child around thoughtlessly definitely takes away from the value of it; motherhood is supposed to be special and your child should be precious, it shouldn't just show up, unwanted, on your doorstep. 


3. What is the role of a mother? Do you think the title of mother is something that should be earned, or a natural right of a woman who gave birth?
Just because a woman has given birth does not make her a mother, in my opinion. A mother should care for their child and look after it. There are plenty of birth-givers who don't deserve the role of mother, especially in 'Storked' when they literally give their child away. 

4. What skills or attributes do Connor and Risa have that work well together?

It seems like Connor pretends to be tough when he truly is very sensitive and a bit nervous - this is evident through the quote, "He [Connor] might act like the bad boy at school--but running away on his own? He doesn't even know if he has the guts." Meanwhile Risa, having grown up in a state home, has a bit of a temper and is very tough, at least I think so. This personality clash is actually quite good as their traits work well together - Connor being nervous could prevent Risa from doing something regrettable and vice versa. 

5. Connor and Lev have very different experiences with storking. How has this helped shape each of their attitudes against the society they live in? 
Lev has a positive attitude on storking, because his experience didn't end up going bad, whereas Connor's experience was negative. It's for these reasons that Lev has a more positive attitude towards society - evident when he wants to be unwound - and Connor has more of a rebellious attitude towards society. Both very different experiences, and very different attitudes, I believe.

6. Connor is concerned the baby won't be loved, and ultimately will die, so he takes it. What does this show us about him as a person?
I think this shows readers that deep down, despite being known as quite a rebellious delinquent/Unwind, he truly has a sensitive side and is willing to sacrifice himself in order to save someone else - in this case, it's the baby he saved.

7. What makes Lev realise he doesn't want to be unwound?He has this epiphany when he calls Pastor Dan; and through the quote, "Don't you see, Lev? You can save yourself. You can be anyone you want to be now.  I think this is where Lev starts to realise that he doesn't have to get 'tithed' to make someone else happy (parents, Pastor Dan) he is free, and no one expects him to return home. Through the words of Pastor Dan encouraging him to run - Pastor Dan being someone he trusts and has faith in - this is when Lev starts to realise he doesn't want to be unwound after all. 

8. Each of the other characters on the run has a tragic backstory. Why were Hayden, Roland and Mai sent to be unwound? Which, do you think, has the most tragic backstory? 
I noticed a pattern. It seemed like none of their parents really wanted their children - especially not Mai - and it was always impacting the children as none of them wanted to be unwound (unlike Lev). But, that said, I was truly saddened whilst reading Roland's backstory. To be betrayed by your own mother after you'd just fought for her, it showed that she cared more about the abusive stepfather than her own son. That ranks a 10 on the Kleenex scale, personally.

9. What tattoo does Roland have?
Roland has a tattoo on his wrist of a tiger shark, despite Connor calling it a dolphin. That sounds like a pretty cool tattoo and I'm pretty intrigued as to why Roland got it, or if there even is a reason at all. 

STORKED WORKSHOP DISCUSSION

If you were in Connor's position, would you have saved the storked baby?
Don't call me a sadist, but I think I'd be more worried about saving my own life than saving a life that would likely have a better living situation in a house than in the arms of two teenagers running from home. There are so many risks to consider! The baby's health is just one of them. The reasons why I definitely wouldn't pick up that baby is endless. Is there anything even special about the baby? Doesn't Connor seem to regret it in the near future? Wouldn't it just slow them down from escaping? Plus, Connor and Risa don't have a definite future. 

Follow-up task

In the novel Sonia, the owner of the antique shop, has each of the teens she helps write a letter to someone they love. Write your own letter to someone you love and, like the kids in the novel put everything you want to say to that person, good and bad, in the letter. Would you be willing to show this letter to the person you wrote it to? Why or why not? What about in three or four years?

Personally I'd write this letter to my little sister, Ruby. I don't think I'd show her now, but maybe a few years down the track I'd show her, when we've both grown up a bit more. I might not feel the same way, but it would be good to read what I thought a few years ago. But if I did the feel the same way, I feel it would be important to admit my mistakes and my emotions in order to grow and develop our relationship. 



T R A N S I T  ( P A R T  III ) 

1. In the course of the book, Connor and Risa get separated from Lev, who travels for a time with another character. Why do you think Shusterman chose to split the narrative into two distinct threads? What do you think this achieves? How does this impact the evolution of the characters?
I think that the author split the narrative because three stories from similar perspectives may become very boring; and to provide another perspective, the story interests the readers more so. 

2. On p125 and p129, the novel touches on same-sex relationships. Has the attitude toward same-sex couples changed (for better or for worse) in this futuristic society. Explain your response.
Judging by the way same-sex couples are depicted in Transit, I think that the idea of homosexual relationships has changed for worse. This is evident when Lev says, quote, "But... after the Heartland War, didn't they make it illegal for men to get married?" Therefore I think that the attitude towards same-sex couples has worsened. 

3. p130 begins our journey into understanding a bit more about Cy-Fi. Through his character, what do you learn about the effects of unwinding on the both the donor and the receiver?
While reading about Cy-Fi's life, it became evident that the donor, who I have come to believe is named Tyler, is not fully aware that he has been unwound. This makes it clear that there are disadvantages to getting an unwound body part, and that it affects both the donor and the receiver, the receiver (in the case, Cy-Fi) has been affected negatively. As for the donor, it is likely that he did not want to be unwound, and therefore has been affected negatively too. 

4. What is the real reason Cy-Fi need to get to Joplin & Mo? (p131)
The real reason is, the part of the brain Cy-Fi received still is functioning as if it is still being used by Tyler, his donor. This causes Cy-Fi to do things out of his control such as stealing jewellery, like what occured in Transit. It has become apparent that the donor needs to get to Joplin and Mo, possibly because he lived there. 
"All I know is that he's got to get to Joplin, so I got to get him there too. Once we're there, maybe he'll leave me alone." - Cy-Fi. 

5. What is the significance of Connor holding in his anger around Roland? (p147)
It has become evident that Roland wants to fight Connor, and this is because Connor is his biggest threat. However, Roland can easily manipulate people and throwing the first punch would ruin his 'good boy' reputation that he has built up in front of the Fatigues. The only reasonable way Roland can stop Connor is by making him angry enough for him to throw the first punch. So, by holding in his anger around Roland, Connor is not giving into Roland's needs and therefore not starting a fight that could end up with very dire consequences. 

6. Connor's anger and lack of impulse control is often a problem for him, until he learns to control and channel his emotions. Do you ever feel like your impulses are stronger than your will? What strategies do you use to control your feelings? Do they work? 
My impulses definitely used to be stronger than my will - growing up I've always had anger problems but I've gotten help for it and learnt a range of strategies. The strategy I use most is helpful because it prevents me from starting fights which I actually think would be very helpful for Connor. In this strategy, I am the fish, and I learnt not to 'take the bait' - the bait is something that angers me - because if I take the bait, I'll lose my temper and it will have negative consequences. This strategy has become very useful for me and I use it in everyday life, and so I've learnt to control and channel my emotions like Connor. Except I needed 15 weeks of therapy...



D E S T I N A T I O N S  ( P A R T  IIII)

1. This section begins with Lev in a pawnbroker's. What does this tell you about how the character is changing?
This is certainly a significant chance in Lev - what used to be a seemingly obedient, religious kid, is becoming a rebellious AWOL. I don't think the old Lev would ever steal something, let alone try to pawn it off. 

2. While being transported to possible safety, some of the kids on the run wonder, "Would it be better to die or be unwound?" If given the choice, which would you choose? Why? 
I would rather die than be unwound. I think it would be torture, either way, but still, I think of being unwound like a coma, you're partly awake but also paralysed and unable to control yourself - which is a huge fear of mine. Or being buried alive, not able to move much but being fully awake and conscious. Furthermore, knowing that my parents signed a form to have me Unwound would be devastating. I would much rather die knowing that they didn't want it to happen, and knowing that I would be remembered fondly than knowing my parents wanted me to be unwound.

3. Another question the kids in the book discuss is, "If every part of you is still alive but living inside someone else, are you alive or are you dead? They also wonder if consciousness can exist even if it's spread out, and if the soul remains intact. What do you think? 
It depends. Can unwinds, once they've been unwounded, move? Are they conscious? Are the souls still living, like ghosts? There are so many questions that remain unanswered at this point in the book and I'm eager to find out more. 

4. This section of the novel sees Lev and Cy-Fi finally make it to Joplin. As they get closer, Cy-Fi's behaviour gets increasingly erratic. What are some of the things he does, or things he likes, that are not his own behaviours or memories? 
Cy-Fi's body is shaking, his accent is different (speaking more like a Joplin-local) and he knows things like what Joplin High School is famous for (girl's basketball) and recognises few things in Joplin such as the ice cream shop. Weirdly, Cy-Fi can also taste pumpkin ice cream, which he says was Tyler's (?) favourite. 

5. What was Cy-Ty hiding in his backyard?
He was hiding a briefcase full of jewellery, jewels, and rarities such as gold chains and rings. The case was buried deep underground in his backyard, but it took Cy-Ty limited time to find it because Tyler knew exactly where it was. This explains why he wanted to steal shiny things; stealing must be a trait of his. 

6. The section ends with Cy-Ty reaching his destination. What do you think of his parent's behaviour? What does Lev's support tell you about his character? 
Lev is clearly angry at them, which I partly agree with; he went a bit too far. The parents have an excuse to be shocked, I too would be concerned if my supposedly-unwound son turned up in another person's body and started yelling at them. It doesn't give Lev an excuse to give them death-threats. At least, not now.



 G R A V E Y A R D  ( P A R T  V )

1. Which job in the Graveyard does Risa get assigned to? How does this come about?
Risa gets assigned to the medical jet by a stroke of luck. Nearing the end of her job interview, another AWOL comes in with a broken nose. Risa is able to carefully tend to the wound, instantly promoting her from dishwasher to medical. 

2. Why doesn't Connor volunteer for "work"?
Because Connor is seemingly entirely against it: it is as if the Admiral is simply taking advantage of them. The rest of the AWOLS do not seem to care, at least from the perspectives we have been given.  


3. How does Roland unsettle Connor? 
Roland does this in a number of ways: to unsettle him he told Connor about how he was learning to fly (obviously making him seem superior) as well as explaining creepy theories about the Admiral and what he supposedly wants to do to the children (harvest their body parts for himself). This unsettles Connor because Roland gives some pretty compelling arguments, and he fears that it may be true. 


4. P208-209 detail Lev's arrival, and Connor's reaction. Make sure you fill in your character profiles for both characters.
Lev arrived one day on a FedEx Jet, packed into crates of four like every other plane. Connor watched him follow the Goldens in single-file to the newcomer's jet, though at first, Connor didn't recognise him due to how much his appearance had changed. Connor was frustrated and angry yet thrilled to see him alive. His emotions are evident when he punches Lev in the face - "That's for what you did to us," Connor quotes, before pulling him into a tight hug when happiness immediately overwhelms him. 

5. P214-215 Connor learns the truth about the admiral here. How does the Admiral gain Connor's trust? 
Providing Connor with a realistic, good-natured story, which he ensures that Connor believes, means that there are no bad things for Connor to worry about, making the Admiral seem like a good person that is able to be trusted. 6. What, according to the Admiral, is it that Connor is becoming famous for in the Graveyard?
Connor has predominant skills in the 'fixing things' category, which is positive, but he is also known for his impulsive thoughts and actions which can lead to fights starting. 


7. What happens to the Goldens?
The Goldens are put into a crate (we presume that they have been forced inside) and suffocated inside, on one of the Jets. Connor is certain that is is Roland because he isn't aware of anyone else in the Graveyard capable of killing someone. Later on, however, we find out that Roland is not the culprit. 


8. How does Roland begin to assert his power in the Graveyard?
Roland, who I think to be very capable of manipulating people, intentionally spreads rumours he started about the Admiral, resulting in many AWOLS scared or angry as to what his true intentions are. 


9. P222-226 gives us an insight into how the Unwinding Bill was put into law. Summarise what happened, and then why or why not you think it is plausible. 


Pro-life protesters. Washington, Jan 27, 2017. 

A few times throughout the book, readers have been hinted at the Heartland War. This so-called Heartland War, we come to find, was a war that happened years ago; the Pro-Life and Pro-Choice, and the remnants of the American military, helplessly trying to stop this new divided world from killing each other.  It was the creation of the Bill Of Life that calmed people down. The creator won a Nobel Peace Prize that year for the development of a technologically-advanced process called neurografting. Neurografting involved being able to transplant every cell in the human body. He created the Bill Of Life, and eventually the two sides came to an agreement, and Unwinding was passed as a law. 


The Bill Of life stated that between the ages of conception and thirteen years old, a child cannot be terminated intentionally. However, after this period of time, a child can be unwound (through the process of neurografting) and therefore aborted. 10. The Admiral was there when the Bill of Life was signed - do you think this detracts from the believability of the commonplace nature of Unwinding? In your opinion, do you think the book should have a few more generations between those who signed the bill, and the present state in the novel?
I wasn't surprised to know the Admiral was there because he is very passionate about the topic and must have some involvement in the process, I thought. For older generations this probably seems like the best option as the war was so catastrophic. For younger generations this is just normal for them because it's how they were raised.



11. What job does Lev volunteer to do?
Lev volunteers to work on an oil pipeline in Alaska until he's eighteen. I was quite surprised at this because it was said that this was in one of the coldest, worst parts of the world. I definitely wouldn't have taken it!


12. Which part of Harlan Dunfee does Emby have?
Emby has Harlan Dunfee's lungs, which puts him at a disadvantage as Harlan had asthma before he was unwound, passing it on to Emby. 


13. Chapter 49 is from Roland's point of view. Why do you think Shusterman changes the narrative here? What do we learn in this short chapter?
This provides a perspective from Roland's point of view, which is very important in telling the story at this part. We learn about his plans to snitch on the Admiral and the graveyard, while also getting Connor unwound as his revenge for putting him in the crate. This is crucial in telling the story because if it were from Connor or Risa's point of view, essential information would likely be lost. Therefore Shusterman changed the narrative to provide the essential information needed to continue the story. 


14. By the end of this section, things at the Graveyard has deteriorated, with the Unwinds turning on the Admiral, and tearing the place apart. Which character is beaten to death?
Cleaver is beaten to death - "to a pulp" as Connor puts it. Cleaver is the admiral's pilot, and one of the few adults working in the graveyard. 


15. What does the Admiral refuse on p255? What is the doctor's reaction? 
The admiral refuses a heart transplant. This is likely because he doesn't want to have an Unwound's heart in him, he is against the practice of unwinding after all. 


16. Why does Roland have the Juvey-Cops called? Why doesn't his plan happen? 
Roland calls the Juvey-Cops to get revenge on Connor. His plan is ultimately to get Connor and Risa sent to a harvest camp and unwound. The plan backfires, however, because the Juvey-Cops refuse to let Roland go as he himself is an unwind. 



U N W O U N D  ( P A R T  VI) 


1. Connor and Risa are sent to Happy Jack Harvest Camp. Describe what it is like, and explain why it is like this. P265
Happy Jack Harvest Camp is maintained to a high standard (surprisingly). The staff wear cheerful clothing such as floral prints and bright scrubs, there are volleyball and basketball courts set up - with the occasional twelve cameras watching their every move of course. There's the Chop Shop, a big, large building. On top of that is where the band plays as kids are being unwound. The dorms are big and hold around 30 kids in each one: a long, narrow room with windows (shatterproof). 


2. What is the exact percentage of an Unwind that you have to keep alive and why is it not 100%?
They have to keep 99.44% of the Unwind alive, excluding the parts of the body that don't have a function, scientifically known as vestigial structures. An example of these structures include the appendix, which doesn't have a function anymore and has decreased in size through evolution. 


3. What do the Unwinds call the place where unwinding occurs? 
'The Chop Shop'. Probably the most interesting part of the camp for me, I imagine it like a slaughterhouse but with a red carpet leading up to it and a band playing down on them. 


4. Lev too, is at Happy Jack, but as a tithe. Why is this?
This was all part of Lev's plan with Mai and Blaine, there was actually no oil pipeline in Alaska. Instead they intentionally went to Happy Jack harvest camp to become clappers and detonate, blowing up the camp. 


5. On P278, Connor and Roland finally have the fight that has been brewing between them. What does each character realise during this? 
Connor, when is being strangled, makes the decision that he'd rather be killed by Roland than unwound. "Because he'd rather be killed with a furious hand than dismembered with cool indifference."  

Roland realises he's not the killer he may have thought he would be. He eventually lets Connor go, tearful. It may have been Roland's emotion and reluctance that saved Connor's life.

6. P284- What group has Lev joined, who recruited him, and when will they follow out their plan?
Lev joined forces with Mai and Blaine (you may remember Mai from the safehouse) after being recruited by Cleaver, the helicopter pilot/Golden/poor soul that was beaten to death by Unwinds. Their plan is to bomb Happy Jack Harvest Camp as clappers. "We have no cause but chaos," Cleaver quotes. 

7. Roland is called for unwinding on P286. Why is this?
He's called for unwinding because he has a rare blood type - blood type AB negative - which is in very high demand. 

8. Chapter 61 is arguably the most confronting chapter in the book. Here we have Roland's first person narrative of being unwound. Do you think this chapter is necessary? Why do you think Shusterman chose to have Roland's narrative detailed? Do his memories alter how you view him?
Shusterman likely chose to have Roland's narrative detailed because not only does it give readers an insight into what Unwinding feels and looks like, but it provides a back story that may make readers feel sorry for Roland being unwound. Readers have seen Roland as tough and seemingly emotionless, and this chapter makes readers recognise that he has feelings too, even if she doesn't show them. 

9. Why does Lev decide not to clap? 
He sees that Connor is being unwound and still alive, and decides against clapping.



Thursday 28 March 2019

A Recap of Week 9 Maths

Week 9 Maths Recap

1. What were the main mathematical concepts or ideas that you learned about or that we discussed in class? 
We discussed circumferences of circles, scientific notation, speed, and distance. 

3. What new vocab words or terms were introduced? 
Diameter, circumference, Pi, radius, scientific notation - I didn't know/hadn't heard of these words beforehand, but now that I confidently know all of them I'm pretty proud of myself. 




In recent weeks, 10Sp has been learning about numerous areas (no pun intended) of mathematics with Mr. Werder, and I decided I'd share some with you. Not only did I learn a few things that I had no idea of, I extended my knowledge further on things I already knew at least a tiny aspect of. 

An example of a maths problem we did in our groups:

"Tennis balls come in a tube of three, typically. If you were to measure it out, what is bigger - the height of the tube or the diameter of the tube?" 

Out of everything we've done this was my favourite because we were provided with helpful examples, some questions to ask, and I feel as if my group (consisting of Josh, Jnaya, Natasha and myself) really worked together well to work out the problem, and were able to understand it thoroughly. 

Using terms we'd learned in previous weeks on Mathletics and group problems with Mr Werder, we were able to work out the diameter of the tennis ball. Natasha had the idea of tracing around the ball so we easily did that.
The diameter, if you didn't know is the space between one side to another. In this case, we discovered the tennis ball's circumference was 7 cm. When measuring the diameter it was vital that we measured from the widest part of the ball (the very centre) to ensure it was accurate. 

We determined the next step was to work out the height of the tube. This was very simple in my opinion. There were 3 7x7 balls in the tube, meaning we simply had to multiple 3 x (3 balls, 7cm in diameter) to find the height of the tube. 3x 7 is 21. The height of the tube is 21cm. 

To explain it a bit further, to work out the circumference, use this formula.














If you are unfamiliar with Pi, it is equal to 3.14, and the symbol looks like this: π. Derived from the Ancient Greek letter Pi. 
Now, time to answer the question. Which is bigger, the diameter of the tennis ball tube, or the height of the tennis ball tube? 

To answer this we had to find the circumference using the formula above. 

C= 3.14 x 7 = 21.98cm
(Circumference = 3.14 (Pi) multipled by 7 (7cm is the diameter of the tennis ball) = 21.98cm is the circumference of the tennis ball tube.)

From there we were able to determine that the circumference of the tube is bigger. This is because 3 x 7 (21) is smaller than 3.14 x 7 (21.98). Therefore the circumference would always be bigger than the height in instances where there is three balls/objects stacked like tennis balls in a tube, even if it was three enormous planets stacked up in a tube, the circumference of the tube would always be bigger because 3.14 is bigger than 3.

If you'd like to explore more of the maths work we did, here is a compilation of the problems we solved in our groups. Leave a comment if you worked one out, or leave some feedback if you'd like me to explain any of them further. 



Have a good day!

Human Trafficking Paragraph

Human Trafficking SEEL Paragraph
Why does Human Trafficking occur and how does it take away our right to freedom?

Human Trafficking still happens not only in exchange for inexpensive labour, drugs, and sexual acts, but because it is a very low-risk dynamic, many nations are not doing enough to abolish it. Human Trafficking is the purchase, kidnapping, and selling of humans, typically women and children. In fact, 20% of all victims worldwide are children, most of them girls. These women and children are often sold into prostitution, though it is still common for both men and women to be sold to anyone willing to pay, even to private properties for sexual gratification and domestic labour. Humans are typically sold for money or drugs, the homeless and orphan children being the most vulnerable. The practise often occurs in under-developed countries such as but not limited to: Thailand, Pakistan, China, India and Bangladesh. It is these countries that have the worst statistics for trafficking in the world. Over 20 million women, men, and children across the globe are living in devastating conditions and poverty. It's a complete violation of human rights, because it takes away the freedom and worth of these millions of people. Yet, despite this complete ignorance for our own people's human rights, nations are doing nowhere near enough to abolish human trafficking. 

Tuesday 26 March 2019

TAHA WAIRUA 💕

Since health has started for 2019, we have been working towards the completion of some activities focusing on Taha Wairua (our spiritual wellbeing). 


Spiritual well being is not just about religion, which is what most people think. Spiritual wellbeing is also about what you believe in and what you don't believe in: your personal opinions that contribute to your identity and wellbeing. It also extends to your personal goals and achievements. This unit has only extended my knowledge on what I already know about taha wairua.


BELIEF- “Trust, faith or confidence in someone or something”. Acceptance that something is true.

VALUES- what you believe to be right and important.
One activity I liked in particular was doing a 'Barrett Values Test'. This test was able to tell me more about my personality and what kind of person I am based on the values I personally chose were important to me. 








The values to the right are what I chose are most important to me, and what I feel I identify with. The most significant, however, are achievement and personal image, and from there I continued on.







My next steps are to work on the other three dimensions of Hauora and extend my knowledge further on these topics. 

Friday 22 March 2019

WORST COUNTRIES FOR CHILD LABOUR 🌍



SEEL Paragraph (Draft)

Children are to this day still used in slave labour simply because their families literally can’t afford not to sell them. In underdeveloped countries such as Pakistan, Sudan, Somalia and Afghanistan, over half of the population lives in poverty. Child labour in these countries is widely-socially accepted. And as a result, parents making their children work is often the only way to repay any debt that they may have. For instance, if someone in a family falls ill, (which is common in underdeveloped countries) parents are often forced to take out loans to pay for necessities such as medicine.

This is not only devastating for the families but it impacts the children in many ways, taking away their human rights is just one of them. To name a few, labour takes away their education and safety. Children often work for years in dangerous and hazardous conditions, so dangerous, in fact, that the ILO estimates that 22,000 children are killed at work every year. What's more, children often are forced to work from a very early age for years, simply because their family could not afford not to.

ORPHISM; developing ideas

Sonia Delaunay
Oil on canvas
1938
 Sonia Delaunay was a French-Ukrainian painter who was notable for her use of geometric shapes and colour blocking in her artwork -  a style known as Orphism.

Orphism was a type of art which gave priority to the abstraction of art and the use of bright colours. Named by Guillaume Apollinaire, he named the style Orphism after the Greek poet and artist, Orpheus. 
Orphism was inspired by that of cubism - the use of geometry, etc. - but also believed that colour was a powerful element to include in art. So, unlike cubists, who removed most colour from their art, Orphism includes bright colours and geometric fragmentation.

Sonia Delaunay continued making art until she was older, working from the time she moved to Paris in the very early 20th century (estimated 1905) to just before her death in Paris at the age of 94 in 1979. She was not only known for her brilliant paintings but her fabric and costume-making, textile design, and stage set design. 









Friday March 22nd
Spent half the lesson catching up on this blog post due to me being absent yesterday (wow what a surprise.) However, I enjoyed getting to work a bit on these thumbnail sketches.




Friday 15 March 2019


PERFORMING ARTS MEGA BLOG (updated weekly)


1. Who are you performing with?
I am performing with my friends Nadia and Samantha. Check out their school blogs at: http://hhsnadiao.blogspot.com and hhssamanthar.blogspot.com


2. Which type of performing art are you performing?

We decided on performing 'musical theatre'. On the assessment task sheet musical theatre must include dialogue and a song.

3. What song/theme are you performing and why?

After some planning and some singing, we decided on Candy Store from the musical Heathers. Visit the original video that we have been inspired by below! We picked this because it's personally one of Nadia and Sam's favourite musicals movies and after listening to it, I loved the soundtrack so much too. 


4. What are we starting with first?
I am of course going to listen to and learn the lyrics  before we begin practising. I'm actually the only one in the trio that doesn't know all of the lyrics because I hadn't seen it before this... lucky me. 

MICHAEL MEW INSPIRED COLLAGE


In art, we have been working towards the completion of a mixed-media collage inspired by the artist, Michael Mew. Michael Mew, if you don't know, is a (currently) 61-year-old collage artist who is known for his unique, mixed-media collages as well as painting, but for this topic we focused primarily on collages. 
Creating the collage was quite interesting yet scary at the same time; I've never actually tried my hand at collage for a long time. 

We started off by cutting out pieces of magazine; this was my favourite part personally. I didn't have an idea in mind at this point and I think that's where I went wrong. I found that without a structured idea or thumbnail sketch, which I was unable to complete because I wasn't here (oh, the shame!) the whole piece was difficult to work with and I couldn't decide on anything. 

The next part we took some time to arrange and come up with potential ideas WITHOUT gluing down. We'd previously been working with Whaea Rowena on focal points, thumbnail sketches, leading lines, etc, etc, but for me it was really about just getting something reasonable on the page. Second red flag. 

Now, the task we were set was meant to be a mixed-media collage, so of course we had to use another medium. We also had the task of including a bird in our work so I thought I'd kill two birds with one stone (pun intended) and draw out a rorirori (grey warbler) bird, which was my personal favourite out of the choices we had. The birds, by the way, are also the names for the new building that are currently being constructed at Hornby High School. 


Another media I used in my piece was watercolour paint - purple. I planned this out as a 'river' - breaking the piece in two to make it look unique, and also to colourblock, which is something we learnt about previously. Colour-blocking is a technique I wished that I used more in this just because I think the work became way more busier and cluttered than I would have liked. 

Now, onto the point of the blog point.

Focal point
My focal point was intended to be the hand. I thought this was a good choice because it was bright and big, but as the work developed I could see that I needed something else. It was Whaea Rowena that influenced my decision to actually do something about it and I decided to incorporate some white paint into it to make it stand out. I ended up painting some dripping white off the side of the hand which I think looked good, although it was difficult to get the white to look opaque because the glossy card beneath it was not a good texture to work on top of. This is another example of why I really need to plan and structure my artwork next time!!!

Leading lines
I think I used leading lines okay. There are lines stretching from the side and the top. One thing we learnt about was using a subtle kind-of 'grid' pattern in our artwork, which is a technique I think Michael Mew uses very well. I really liked, however, how I used the diagonal line in the bottom right corner and I think this is something I'll incorporate into my future art.

Layers
One thing I think I did well was how I layered my artwork out. There were some places that were layered and some that weren't, which I think made for a really nicely layered piece.

Overall, I'm definitely not proud of this collage because of all the mistakes I made not only in the actual 'making' process but in the planning process. But, as Bob Ross says, we don't make mistakes, just happy little accidents. But at least this happy little accident that this turned out to be is my happy little accident.